When shopping for an aviation headset, pilots inevitably encounter the term TSO (Technical Standard Order). The question of whether a headset is TSO-approved is one of the most polarizing topics in aviation gear, pitting manufacturers with approved products against those who argue the standard is unnecessary for most pilots.
To provide clarity for our customers, we’ve synthesized the arguments from leading manufacturers like Bose Aviation and Lightspeed Aviation, alongside regulatory facts, to offer an unbiased perspective on what TSO means for your next headset purchase.
What is TSO? An Authorization, Not an Installation Approval.
First, it’s important to clarify the definition of TSO, which is issued by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).
A TSO is a Minimum Performance Standard (MPS) for specified materials, parts, and appliances used on civil aircraft. TSO-C139 is the specific standard governing aviation audio systems and equipment, including headsets.
When a manufacturer is granted a TSO Authorisation (TSOA), they receive both design and production approval. This means the FAA has confirmed that the manufacturer’s design, testing, and quality assurance processes meet the minimum performance requirements defined by the TSO.
Crucially, TSO authorisation is not an approval for installation or use. It simply verifies that the item meets a specific manufacturing and testing standard, making it eligible for installation on a type-certified aircraft if specified by the airframe manufacturer.
It is also really important to remember that if a product does not have TSO Authorisation, it does not mean that their product is automatically built to a lower standard. Many manufactuers don't see the need to incur the costs assocaiated with gaining TSO Authorisation, and so simply don't apply for it, even if their products would meet or exceed this standard.
The Case for TSO: Reliability Through Rigorous Testing
For companies like Bose Aviation, TSO is a non-negotiable part of their commitment to safety and durability. Their core argument is that TSO provides an indispensable assurance of reliability, especially in challenging operational environments.
Why TSO Matters: The Stress Tests
To achieve TSO-C139 approval, a headset must successfully pass a comprehensive suite of demanding environmental and durability tests—often requiring thousands of pages of documentation and FAA oversight of the production facility. These tests validate the product’s ability to perform its core function (communication) under extreme conditions.
Key Tests Required for TSO Authorization (TSO-C139 often references standards like RTCA DO-160):
Test Category |
Example Requirements |
| Environmental | Withstanding extreme heat (e.g., 55°C/131°F) and sub-zero temperatures (e.g., -25°C/-13°F). |
| Durability | Decompression testing (simulating ascent to service ceiling altitudes), crushing/mechanical shock tests, and vibration table testing across all frequencies. |
| Safety | Explosive atmosphere testing (for certain components) and resistance to electrostatic discharge (ESD), preventing static electricity from causing failure. |
| Functionality | Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) and Radio Frequency (RF) immunity testing to ensure communication clarity is maintained near other avionics or external signals. |
| Extended Life | Extended wear and flex testing on cables and components equivalent to years of use. |
TSO manufacturers often argue that while the standard is defined as "minimum performance," the rigor of these environmental tests sets a high bar for physical resilience that goes beyond consumer-grade electronics standards.
The Non-TSO Perspective: Quality, Cost, and Comfort
Manufacturers like Lightspeed Aviation choose not to pursue TSO authorization, arguing that while the tests are robust, the authorization itself does not guarantee a better pilot experience and adds unnecessary costs that are passed onto the customer.
TSO is Not Mandated for Most Pilots
The most crucial point from the non-TSO perspective is regulatory reality: The FAA does not require a TSO-authorized headset for use in any civil aviation operation, including Part 91 (General Aviation), Part 121 (Airlines), or Part 135 (Charter).
If a TSO headset is required, the mandate comes not from the FAA, but from the individual airline or operator’s Operations Manual (OpSpecs). Even in these cases, the requirement is often satisfied if a TSO headset is simply available in the cockpit as a backup, allowing the pilot to wear a personal, non-TSO headset.
Alternative Quality Standards
Lightspeed argues that a standard more applicable to overall quality assurance is ISO 9001:2015 certification, an internationally recognized quality management system. Companies with this certification adhere to stringent internal processes for design, production, and auditing.
Furthermore, non-TSO manufacturers claim they often perform the same rigorous environmental testing required by the TSO, but avoid the costly, bureaucratic paperwork needed to maintain the official FAA authorization, saving the customer money.
The Focus on Pilot Experience
Non-TSO proponents also point out an ironic gap in the TSO standard: TSO-C139 sets no specific performance metrics for comfort or ANR (Active Noise Reduction) effectiveness. These factors are often the primary drivers of pilot purchasing decisions. Manufacturers are free to focus on these experiential elements without the constraint of the TSO process.
______________________________________________________________________
The Australian Context: TSO, ETSO, and CASA
For pilots operating under the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) in Australia, the principles of TSO remain largely the same.
-
Australian Technical Standard Order (ATSO): CASA has its own equivalent approval system called the ATSO. Importantly, CASA's regulations generally accept both the FAA TSO and the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) ETSO (European Technical Standard Order) as meeting the acceptable minimum performance standards for aeronautical products.
-
Pilot Requirements: Similar to the U.S., CASA generally does not mandate the use of a TSO/ETSO/ATSO-approved headset for General Aviation (GA) pilots. Pilots are free to choose their personal communications equipment based on performance and comfort.
-
Commercial Operations: The requirement for an approved headset in Australia is almost always a mandate set by the specific commercial operator (e.g., an airline or charter company) within their internal policies or Operations Manuals. If you are a professional pilot, you must check your employer’s specific documentation to ensure compliance.
______________________________________________________________________
Conclusion: Which Headset Should You Choose?
The decision between TSO and non-TSO ultimately depends on your specific operational environment. There are high-quality, reliable products in both categories.
Factor |
TSO Headsets (e.g., Bose A30) |
Non-TSO Headsets (e.g., Lightspeed Zulu) |
| Legal Requirement (FAA/CASA) | Required only if your airline/operator mandates it. CASA accepts FAA TSO/EASA ETSO as equivalent to ATSO for manufacturing approval. | Not Required by the FAA or CASA for any civil flight. |
| Quality Guarantee | Guarantees FAA/EASA-approved design and production under rigorous environmental and durability standards. | Guaranteed quality assurance through systems like ISO 9001:2015 and comprehensive internal testing. |
| Focus | Physical durability, systems compatibility, and documentation. | Comfort, cutting-edge ANR technology, and feature-to-price value. |
| Cost | Typically higher due to the significant cost and time investment in the TSO process. | Can often offer comparable quality/performance at a lower price point by avoiding TSO bureaucracy. |
Final Recommendation:
-
If you are a General Aviation (GA) pilot (Part 91 in the US, or equivalent private operation in Australia): TSO status is irrelevant from a regulatory standpoint. Choose the headset that offers the best blend of comfort, ANR performance, features, and durability for your needs and budget.
-
If you are an aspiring or current Professional Pilot (Part 121/135 in the US, or equivalent commercial operation in Australia): Check your specific airline's or operator's Operations Manual before purchasing. If your employer strictly requires an FAA TSO- or EASA ETSO-approved headset to be worn, your choice is limited to those products. If the requirement is only that an approved headset be available as a backup, you are free to wear a personal non-TSO model.
Specific Article References:
Bose: Why TSO Matters?
Lightspeed: Does TSO Matter for Headsets?